Match.com Reveals the black S Alas, the online dating sites industry isn't all flowers and moonlit walks. For businesses that offer online dating services, it is a competitive globe where each major business needs to one-up the other within their claims - exactly how many users get communications, just how many of these communications result in times, and exactly how numerous marriages emerge from those unions. A page just sent by Match.com to just competitor Plentyoffish reveals exactly exactly how really these businesses make the figures. The page is not very very long - soon, that is, apart from a list that is bullet-pointed of stats from Plentyoffish's advertising materials, which Match.com challenges its competitor to substantiate. Record includes claims that Plentyoffish produces over 500,000 brand new relationships and 18 million times every year, and 20,000 brand brand new signups daily. "According to my familiarity with the industry, " writes Match basic counsel Marshall Dye, "these claims is not supported consequently they are deceptive and/or false. " These kinds of letters are most likely fairly typical; what exactly is unusual is seeing them provided. But Plentyoffish creator Markus Frind not just posted the page, he additionally responded it with a post starting his or her own suspicions of exaggeration by Match. (The ellipses are my very own): This page is beyond ironic considering match's reputation for bogus claims, like this 1 from a week ago. Match claims that 42% of times from internet dating sites are as results of match.com and 30% of marriages are a total outcome of match.com Whatever they neglect to aim away is the fact that match 's been around for 15 years & most of the web web internet sites placed in the survey scarcely existed five years back. When we really glance at exactly what match.com claims it gets to the ridiculous. Final they claimed 12 marriages per day year. Eharmony claims 236 marriages per time Now per year later match.com claims twice as much quantity of marriages as eharmony in this study around 472 marriages per time or 994 individuals engaged and getting married per day. On match.com you cannot speak with a user if you do not spend. Therefore does anybody actually genuinely believe that every day 944 away from 3000 brand new spending users of match.com are certain to get married ultimately as a result of whom they came across on match.com? Do 1 in 3 spending readers of match.com also head out on a night out together. As Frind points down, Match attempted to compete by starting a website this past year called DowntoEarth.com, but neglected to find any development (just like eBayClassifieds.com flopped). So Match now seemingly have shifted to Arrange B: threatening legal action. Trending News ›The issue is that, as Frind's flippant publishing programs, it isn't very likely to get terribly far. Together with free internet internet sites are making a very severe case that there is no significance of Match or other paid dating sites. A couple weeks back OKCupid, another free site, posted its very own long, stats-heavy assault on Match and eHarmony: Yes, only 1/30th of the "20 million usersyou can actually talk to" theyeHarmony advertise is someone. This is the paradox: the greater they increase their account totals to persuade one to subscribe, the even even worse they appear. As you can plainly see through the movement chart, the only path they don't really generate income would be to show members with other customers. It is the thing that is worst they could do with regards to their company, because there is no prospect of new revenue development here. Keep in mind: the common account size is merely six months, join for big obstructs at a time, so getting consumer aboard is much better for them than eking another couple of months away from a subscriber that is current. Okay, Match is double counting to have "12 couples", since that gets hitched also gets engaged. A year so we have 6 couples per day getting married on the site, or 4,380 people. Why don't we round up to 5,000, things easy. My very first observation is the fact that Match.com made $342,600,000 just last year 5. That is $137,000 in individual costs per wedding. As it happens you may be 12.4 times prone to obtain married this season donate to Match.com. But at the conclusion of the afternoon, Match is not at serious threat to be overcome in the future by Plentyoffish, or other site that is free. Match has existed for more than a ten years, and also its rivals acknowledge so it continues to attract customers. As constantly when you look at the technology the planet, the risk that is biggest may lie in a location that no one is viewing. My very own guess: the spot that is blind most of the above internet dating sites is Twitter. Is Facebook free, nonetheless it comes with no stigma that nevertheless carry, and it's also currently a car for a good amount of effective hook-ups that are romantic. When it comes to minute, Twitter appears like a non-rival; the few dating organizations that have actually attempted to start on Facebook have by and big failed. For his or her component, the main online dating sites have actually ignored Facebook. That is a mistake, though - the factor that is social essential, along with the casual dynamic on Facebook. And there is one or more dating website appearing as you can see from the Compete graph below, has suddenly begun to grow very quickly that it can leverage Facebook: Zoosk.com, which has a prominent Facebook application and. © 2010 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. - הסוכנות היהודית

Match.com Reveals the black S Alas, the online dating sites industry isn’t all flowers and moonlit walks. For businesses that offer online dating services, it is a competitive globe where each major business needs to one-up the other within their claims — exactly how many users get communications, just how many of these communications result in times, and exactly how numerous marriages emerge from those unions. A page just sent by Match.com to just competitor Plentyoffish reveals exactly exactly how really these businesses make the figures. The page is not very very long — soon, that is, apart from a list that is bullet-pointed of stats from Plentyoffish’s advertising materials, which Match.com challenges its competitor to substantiate. Record includes claims that Plentyoffish produces over 500,000 brand new relationships and 18 million times every year, and 20,000 brand brand new signups daily. “According to my familiarity with the industry, ” writes Match basic counsel Marshall Dye, “these claims is not supported consequently they are deceptive and/or false. ” These kinds of letters are most likely fairly typical; what exactly is unusual is seeing them provided. But Plentyoffish creator Markus Frind not just posted the page, he additionally responded it with a post starting his or her own suspicions of exaggeration by Match. (The ellipses are my very own): This page is beyond ironic considering match’s reputation for bogus claims, like this 1 from a week ago. Match claims that 42% of times from internet dating sites are as results of match.com and 30% of marriages are a total outcome of match.com Whatever they neglect to aim away is the fact that match ‘s been around for 15 years & most of the web web internet sites placed in the survey scarcely existed five years back. When we really glance at exactly what match.com claims it gets to the ridiculous. Final they claimed 12 marriages per day year. Eharmony claims 236 marriages per time Now per year later match.com claims twice as much quantity of marriages as eharmony in this study around 472 marriages per time or 994 individuals engaged and getting married per day. On match.com you cannot speak with a user if you do not spend. Therefore does anybody actually genuinely believe that every day 944 away from 3000 brand new spending users of match.com are certain to get married ultimately as a result of whom they came across on match.com? Do 1 in 3 spending readers of match.com also head out on a night out together. As Frind points down, Match attempted to compete by starting a website this past year called DowntoEarth.com, but neglected to find any development (just like eBayClassifieds.com flopped). So Match now seemingly have shifted to Arrange B: threatening legal action. Trending News ›The issue is that, as Frind’s flippant publishing programs, it isn’t very likely to get terribly far. Together with free internet internet sites are making a very severe case that there is no significance of Match or other paid dating sites. A couple weeks back OKCupid, another free site, posted its very own long, stats-heavy assault on Match and eHarmony: Yes, only 1/30th of the “20 million usersyou can actually talk to” theyeHarmony advertise is someone. This is the paradox: the greater they increase their account totals to persuade one to subscribe, the even even worse they appear. As you can plainly see through the movement chart, the only path they don’t really generate income would be to show members with other customers. It is the thing that is worst they could do with regards to their company, because there is no prospect of new revenue development here. Keep in mind: the common account size is merely six months, join for big obstructs at a time, so getting consumer aboard is much better for them than eking another couple of months away from a subscriber that is current. Okay, Match is double counting to have “12 couples”, since that gets hitched also gets engaged. A year so we have 6 couples per day getting married on the site, or 4,380 people. Why don’t we round up to 5,000, things easy. My very first observation is the fact that Match.com made $342,600,000 just last year 5. That is $137,000 in individual costs per wedding. As it happens you may be 12.4 times prone to obtain married this season donate to Match.com. But at the conclusion of the afternoon, Match is not at serious threat to be overcome in the future by Plentyoffish, or other site that is free. Match has existed for more than a ten years, and also its rivals acknowledge so it continues to attract customers. As constantly when you look at the technology the planet, the risk that is biggest may lie in a location that no one is viewing. My very own guess: the spot that is blind most of the above internet dating sites is Twitter. Is Facebook free, nonetheless it comes with no stigma that nevertheless carry, and it’s also currently a car for a good amount of effective hook-ups that are romantic. When it comes to minute, Twitter appears like a non-rival; the few dating organizations that have actually attempted to start on Facebook have by and big failed. For his or her component, the main online dating sites have actually ignored Facebook. That is a mistake, though — the factor that is social essential, along with the casual dynamic on Facebook. And there is one or more dating website appearing as you can see from the Compete graph below, has suddenly begun to grow very quickly that it can leverage Facebook: Zoosk.com, which has a prominent Facebook application and. © 2010 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Homeestablished men mobile siteMatch.com Reveals the black S Alas, the online dating sites industry isn’t all flowers and moonlit walks. For businesses that offer online dating services, it is a competitive globe where each major business needs to one-up the other within their claims — exactly how many users get communications, just how many of these communications result in times, and exactly how numerous marriages emerge from those unions. A page just sent by Match.com to just competitor Plentyoffish reveals exactly exactly how really these businesses make the figures. The page is not very very long — soon, that is, apart from a list that is bullet-pointed of stats from Plentyoffish’s advertising materials, which Match.com challenges its competitor to substantiate. Record includes claims that Plentyoffish produces over 500,000 brand new relationships and 18 million times every year, and 20,000 brand brand new signups daily. “According to my familiarity with the industry, ” writes Match basic counsel Marshall Dye, “these claims is not supported consequently they are deceptive and/or false. ” These kinds of letters are most likely fairly typical; what exactly is unusual is seeing them provided. But Plentyoffish creator Markus Frind not just posted the page, he additionally responded it with a post starting his or her own suspicions of exaggeration by Match. (The ellipses are my very own): This page is beyond ironic considering match’s reputation for bogus claims, like this 1 from a week ago. Match claims that 42% of times from internet dating sites are as results of match.com and 30% of marriages are a total outcome of match.com Whatever they neglect to aim away is the fact that match ‘s been around for 15 years & most of the web web internet sites placed in the survey scarcely existed five years back. When we really glance at exactly what match.com claims it gets to the ridiculous. Final they claimed 12 marriages per day year. Eharmony claims 236 marriages per time Now per year later match.com claims twice as much quantity of marriages as eharmony in this study around 472 marriages per time or 994 individuals engaged and getting married per day. On match.com you cannot speak with a user if you do not spend. Therefore does anybody actually genuinely believe that every day 944 away from 3000 brand new spending users of match.com are certain to get married ultimately as a result of whom they came across on match.com? Do 1 in 3 spending readers of match.com also head out on a night out together. As Frind points down, Match attempted to compete by starting a website this past year called DowntoEarth.com, but neglected to find any development (just like eBayClassifieds.com flopped). So Match now seemingly have shifted to Arrange B: threatening legal action. Trending News ›The issue is that, as Frind’s flippant publishing programs, it isn’t very likely to get terribly far. Together with free internet internet sites are making a very severe case that there is no significance of Match or other paid dating sites. A couple weeks back OKCupid, another free site, posted its very own long, stats-heavy assault on Match and eHarmony: Yes, only 1/30th of the “20 million usersyou can actually talk to” theyeHarmony advertise is someone. This is the paradox: the greater they increase their account totals to persuade one to subscribe, the even even worse they appear. As you can plainly see through the movement chart, the only path they don’t really generate income would be to show members with other customers. It is the thing that is worst they could do with regards to their company, because there is no prospect of new revenue development here. Keep in mind: the common account size is merely six months, join for big obstructs at a time, so getting consumer aboard is much better for them than eking another couple of months away from a subscriber that is current. Okay, Match is double counting to have “12 couples”, since that gets hitched also gets engaged. A year so we have 6 couples per day getting married on the site, or 4,380 people. Why don’t we round up to 5,000, things easy. My very first observation is the fact that Match.com made $342,600,000 just last year 5. That is $137,000 in individual costs per wedding. As it happens you may be 12.4 times prone to obtain married this season donate to Match.com. But at the conclusion of the afternoon, Match is not at serious threat to be overcome in the future by Plentyoffish, or other site that is free. Match has existed for more than a ten years, and also its rivals acknowledge so it continues to attract customers. As constantly when you look at the technology the planet, the risk that is biggest may lie in a location that no one is viewing. My very own guess: the spot that is blind most of the above internet dating sites is Twitter. Is Facebook free, nonetheless it comes with no stigma that nevertheless carry, and it’s also currently a car for a good amount of effective hook-ups that are romantic. When it comes to minute, Twitter appears like a non-rival; the few dating organizations that have actually attempted to start on Facebook have by and big failed. For his or her component, the main online dating sites have actually ignored Facebook. That is a mistake, though — the factor that is social essential, along with the casual dynamic on Facebook. And there is one or more dating website appearing as you can see from the Compete graph below, has suddenly begun to grow very quickly that it can leverage Facebook: Zoosk.com, which has a prominent Facebook application and. © 2010 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Match.com Reveals the black S Alas, the online dating sites industry isn’t all flowers and moonlit walks. For businesses that offer online dating services, it is a competitive globe where each major business needs to one-up the other within their claims — exactly how many users get communications, just how many of these communications result in times, and exactly how numerous marriages emerge from those unions. A page just sent by Match.com to just competitor Plentyoffish reveals exactly exactly how really these businesses make the figures. The page is not very very long — soon, that is, apart from a list that is bullet-pointed of stats from Plentyoffish’s advertising materials, which Match.com challenges its competitor to substantiate. Record includes claims that Plentyoffish produces over 500,000 brand new relationships and 18 million times every year, and 20,000 brand brand new signups daily. “According to my familiarity with the industry, ” writes Match basic counsel Marshall Dye, “these claims is not supported consequently they are deceptive and/or false. ” These kinds of letters are most likely fairly typical; what exactly is unusual is seeing them provided. But Plentyoffish creator Markus Frind not just posted the page, he additionally responded it with a post starting his or her own suspicions of exaggeration by Match. (The ellipses are my very own): This page is beyond ironic considering match’s reputation for bogus claims, like this 1 from a week ago. Match claims that 42% of times from internet dating sites are as results of match.com and 30% of marriages are a total outcome of match.com Whatever they neglect to aim away is the fact that match ‘s been around for 15 years & most of the web web internet sites placed in the survey scarcely existed five years back. When we really glance at exactly what match.com claims it gets to the ridiculous. Final they claimed 12 marriages per day year. Eharmony claims 236 marriages per time Now per year later match.com claims twice as much quantity of marriages as eharmony in this study around 472 marriages per time or 994 individuals engaged and getting married per day. On match.com you cannot speak with a user if you do not spend. Therefore does anybody actually genuinely believe that every day 944 away from 3000 brand new spending users of match.com are certain to get married ultimately as a result of whom they came across on match.com? Do 1 in 3 spending readers of match.com also head out on a night out together. As Frind points down, Match attempted to compete by starting a website this past year called DowntoEarth.com, but neglected to find any development (just like eBayClassifieds.com flopped). So Match now seemingly have shifted to Arrange B: threatening legal action. Trending News ›The issue is that, as Frind’s flippant publishing programs, it isn’t very likely to get terribly far. Together with free internet internet sites are making a very severe case that there is no significance of Match or other paid dating sites. A couple weeks back OKCupid, another free site, posted its very own long, stats-heavy assault on Match and eHarmony: Yes, only 1/30th of the “20 million usersyou can actually talk to” theyeHarmony advertise is someone. This is the paradox: the greater they increase their account totals to persuade one to subscribe, the even even worse they appear. As you can plainly see through the movement chart, the only path they don’t really generate income would be to show members with other customers. It is the thing that is worst they could do with regards to their company, because there is no prospect of new revenue development here. Keep in mind: the common account size is merely six months, join for big obstructs at a time, so getting consumer aboard is much better for them than eking another couple of months away from a subscriber that is current. Okay, Match is double counting to have “12 couples”, since that gets hitched also gets engaged. A year so we have 6 couples per day getting married on the site, or 4,380 people. Why don’t we round up to 5,000, things easy. My very first observation is the fact that Match.com made $342,600,000 just last year 5. That is $137,000 in individual costs per wedding. As it happens you may be 12.4 times prone to obtain married this season donate to Match.com. But at the conclusion of the afternoon, Match is not at serious threat to be overcome in the future by Plentyoffish, or other site that is free. Match has existed for more than a ten years, and also its rivals acknowledge so it continues to attract customers. As constantly when you look at the technology the planet, the risk that is biggest may lie in a location that no one is viewing. My very own guess: the spot that is blind most of the above internet dating sites is Twitter. Is Facebook free, nonetheless it comes with no stigma that nevertheless carry, and it’s also currently a car for a good amount of effective hook-ups that are romantic. When it comes to minute, Twitter appears like a non-rival; the few dating organizations that have actually attempted to start on Facebook have by and big failed. For his or her component, the main online dating sites have actually ignored Facebook. That is a mistake, though — the factor that is social essential, along with the casual dynamic on Facebook. And there is one or more dating website appearing as you can see from the Compete graph below, has suddenly begun to grow very quickly that it can leverage Facebook: Zoosk.com, which has a prominent Facebook application and. © 2010 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.

codeoasis 08/01/2021 established men mobile site None

Match.com Reveals the black S </p> <p>Alas, the online dating sites industry isn’t all flowers and moonlit walks. For businesses that offer online dating services, it is a competitive globe where each major business needs to one-up the other within their claims — exactly how many users get communications, just how many of these communications result in times, and exactly how numerous marriages emerge from those unions.<span id="more-14036"></span> A page just sent by Match.com to just competitor Plentyoffish reveals exactly exactly how really these businesses make the figures. </p> <p>The page is not very very long — soon, that is, apart from a list that is bullet-pointed of stats from Plentyoffish’s advertising materials, which Match.com challenges its competitor to substantiate. Record includes claims that Plentyoffish produces over 500,000 brand new relationships and 18 million times every year, and 20,000 brand brand new signups daily. “According to my familiarity with the industry, ” writes Match basic counsel Marshall Dye, “these claims is not supported consequently they are deceptive and/or false. “</p> <p>These kinds of letters are most likely fairly typical; what exactly is unusual is seeing them provided. But Plentyoffish creator Markus Frind not just posted the page, he additionally responded it with a post starting his or her own suspicions of exaggeration by Match. (The ellipses are my very own): </p> <p>This page is beyond ironic considering match’s reputation for bogus claims, like this 1 from a week ago. Match claims that 42% of times from internet dating sites are as results of match.com and 30% of marriages are a total outcome of match.com Whatever they neglect to aim away is the fact that match ‘s been around for 15 years & most of the web web internet sites placed in the survey scarcely existed five years back. </p> <p>When we really glance at exactly what match.com claims it gets to the ridiculous. Final they claimed 12 marriages per day year. Eharmony claims 236 marriages per time Now per year later match.com claims twice as much quantity of marriages as eharmony in this study around 472 marriages per time or 994 individuals engaged and getting married per day. On match.com you cannot speak with a user if you do not spend. Therefore does anybody actually genuinely believe that every day 944 away from 3000 brand new spending users of match.com are certain to get married ultimately as a result of whom they came across on match.com? Do 1 in 3 spending readers of match.com also head out on a night out together. </p> <p>As Frind points down, Match attempted to compete by starting a website this past year called DowntoEarth.com, but neglected to find any development (just like eBayClassifieds.com flopped). So Match now seemingly have shifted to Arrange B: threatening legal action. </p> <h2>Trending News ›</h2> <p>The issue is that, as Frind’s flippant publishing programs, it isn’t very likely to get terribly far. Together with free internet internet sites are making a very severe case that there is no significance of Match or other paid dating sites. A couple weeks back OKCupid, another free site, posted its very own long, stats-heavy assault on Match and eHarmony: </p> <p>Yes, only 1/30th of the “20 million usersyou can actually talk to” theyeHarmony advertise is someone. This is the paradox: the greater they increase their account totals to persuade one to subscribe, the even even worse they appear. </p> <p>As you can plainly see through the movement chart, the only path they don’t really generate income would be to show members with other customers. It is the thing that is worst they could do with regards to their company, because there is no prospect of new revenue development here. Keep in mind: the common account size is merely six months, join for big obstructs at a time, so getting consumer aboard is much better for them than eking another couple of months away from a subscriber that is current. </p> <p>Okay, Match is double counting to have “12 couples”, since that gets hitched also gets engaged. A year so we have 6 couples per day getting married on the site, or 4,380 people. Why don’t we round up to 5,000, things easy. My very first observation is the fact that Match.com made $342,600,000 just last year 5. That is $137,000 in individual costs per wedding. </p> <h2> As it happens you may be 12.4 times prone to obtain married this season donate to Match.com. </h2> <p>But at the conclusion of the afternoon, Match is not at <a href="//datingmentor.org/established-men-review/"><img src="//media.guestofaguest.com/t_article_content/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/lilli_and_loo_rollover-1.gif" alt=""></a> serious threat to be overcome in the future by Plentyoffish, or other site that is free. Match has existed for more than a ten years, and also its rivals acknowledge so it continues to attract customers. </p> <p>As constantly when you look at the technology the planet, the risk that is biggest may lie in a location that no one is viewing. My very own guess: the spot that is blind most of the above internet dating sites is Twitter. Is Facebook free, nonetheless it comes with no stigma that nevertheless carry, and it’s also currently a car for a good amount of effective hook-ups that are romantic. </p> <p>When it comes to minute, Twitter appears like a non-rival; the few dating organizations that have actually attempted to start on Facebook have by and big failed. For his or her component, the main online dating sites have actually ignored Facebook. That is a mistake, though — the factor that is social essential, along with the casual dynamic on Facebook. And there is one or more dating website appearing as you can see from the Compete graph below, has suddenly begun to grow very quickly that it can leverage Facebook: Zoosk.com, which has a prominent Facebook application and. </p> <p><small>© 2010 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. </small> </p> </div> <div class="split-post-pagination clearfix"> </div> </article> <nav class="navigation post-navigation" role="navigation"> <h2 class="screen-reader-text">Post navigation</h2> <div class="nav-links"><div class="nav-previous"><a href="//lln-websites.com/ja-donations/kokettieren-rein-amsterdam-joost-kuratiert/" rel="prev">Kokettieren rein amsterdam. Joost kuratiert heutzutage unser Valtifest-Musikfestival, das jГ¤hrliches Glanzleistung</a></div><div class="nav-next"><a href="//lln-websites.com/ja-donations/cual-es-el-superior-portal-de-citas-en-espaga/" rel="next">Cual es el superior portal de citas en EspaГ±a?</a></div></div> </nav> <div id="comments" class="comments-area"> <div id="respond" class="comment-respond"> <h3 id="reply-title" class="comment-reply-title">Leave a Reply <small><a rel="nofollow" id="cancel-comment-reply-link" href="/ja-donations/match-com-reveals-the-black-s-alas-the-online-6/#respond" style="display:none;">Cancel reply</a></small></h3> <form action="//lln-websites.com/ja-donations/wp-comments-post.php" method="post" id="commentform" class="comment-form" novalidate> <p class="comment-notes"><span id="email-notes">Your email address will not be published.</span> Required fields are marked <span class="required">*</span></p><p class="comment-form-comment"><label for="comment">Comment</label> <textarea id="comment" name="comment" cols="45" rows="8" maxlength="65525" aria-required="true" required="required"></textarea></p><input name="wpml_language_code" type="hidden" value="en" /><p class="comment-form-author"><label for="author">Name <span class="required">*</span></label> <input id="author" name="author" type="text" value="" size="30" maxlength="245" aria-required='true' required='required' /></p> <p class="comment-form-email"><label for="email">Email <span class="required">*</span></label> <input id="email" name="email" type="email" value="" size="30" maxlength="100" aria-describedby="email-notes" aria-required='true' required='required' /></p> <p class="comment-form-url"><label for="url">Website</label> <input id="url" name="url" type="url" value="" size="30" maxlength="200" /></p> <p class="form-submit"><input name="submit" type="submit" id="submit" class="submit" value="Post Comment" /> <input type='hidden' name='comment_post_ID' value='14036' id='comment_post_ID' /> <input type='hidden' name='comment_parent' id='comment_parent' value='0' /> </p> </form> </div> </div> </div> </main> </div> </div> <footer id="colophon" class="site-footer"> <div class="site-info"> <div class="container"> <p id="footer_copyright"> <div class="copyright-left" style="color:white;"> הסוכנות היהודית ממומנת על ידי הפדרציות היהודיות של צפון אמריקה / המגבית המאוחדת לישראל, קרן היסוד, קרנות ותורמים מישראל ומרחבי העולם | <a style="color:white;" href="//www.jewishagency.org/il/privacy-policy/"> מדיניות פרטיות </a> | <a style="color:white;" href="//www.jewishagency.org/il/terms-of-use/"> תנאי שימוש </a> </div> </p> </div> </div> </footer> </div> <script type='text/javascript'> /* <![CDATA[ */ var wcml_mc_settings = {"wcml_spinner":"https:\/\/lln-websites.com\/ja-donations\/wp-content\/plugins\/woocommerce-multilingual\/res\/images\/ajax-loader.gif","current_currency":{"code":"GBP","symbol":"£"},"w3tc":""}; /* ]]> */ </script> <script type='text/javascript' src='//lln-websites.com/ja-donations/wp-content/plugins/woocommerce-multilingual/res/js/wcml-multi-currency.min.js?ver=4.2.5'></script> <script type='text/javascript' src='//lln-websites.com/ja-donations/wp-content/plugins/totaldonations/js/circle-progress.js?ver=1.1'></script> <script type='text/javascript' src='//lln-websites.com/ja-donations/wp-content/plugins/woocommerce/assets/js/jquery-blockui/jquery.blockUI.min.js?ver=2.70'></script> <script type='text/javascript' src='//lln-websites.com/ja-donations/wp-content/plugins/woocommerce/assets/js/js-cookie/js.cookie.min.js?ver=2.1.4'></script> <script type='text/javascript'> /* <![CDATA[ */ var woocommerce_params = {"ajax_url":"\/ja-donations\/wp-admin\/admin-ajax.php","wc_ajax_url":"https:\/\/lln-websites.com\/ja-donations\/?wc-ajax=%%endpoint%%"}; /* ]]> */ </script> <script type='text/javascript' src='//lln-websites.com/ja-donations/wp-content/plugins/woocommerce/assets/js/frontend/woocommerce.min.js?ver=3.2.1'></script> <script type='text/javascript'> /* <![CDATA[ */ var wc_cart_fragments_params = {"ajax_url":"\/ja-donations\/wp-admin\/admin-ajax.php","wc_ajax_url":"https:\/\/lln-websites.com\/ja-donations\/?wc-ajax=%%endpoint%%","fragment_name":"wc_fragments_5760aaf53fe0a11e1694eaaeb2114cab"}; /* ]]> */ </script> <script type='text/javascript' src='//lln-websites.com/ja-donations/wp-content/plugins/woocommerce/assets/js/frontend/cart-fragments.min.js?ver=3.2.1'></script> <script type='text/javascript' src='//lln-websites.com/ja-donations/wp-content/themes/humanitas/assets/js/bootstrap.min.js?ver=1.0'></script> <script type='text/javascript'> /* <![CDATA[ */ var countdown_object = {"data_day":"day","data_days":"days","data_hour":"hour","data_hours":"hours","data_minute":"minute","data_minutes":"minutes","data_second":"second","data_seconds":"seconds","data_invalid_date":"Invalid date. Here's an example: 12 june 2016"}; /* ]]> */ </script> <script type='text/javascript' src='//lln-websites.com/ja-donations/wp-content/themes/humanitas/assets/js/countdown.js'></script> <script type='text/javascript' src='//lln-websites.com/ja-donations/wp-content/themes/humanitas/assets/js/isotope.min.js?ver=1.0'></script> <script type='text/javascript' src='//lln-websites.com/ja-donations/wp-content/themes/humanitas/assets/js/remodal.min.js?ver=1.0'></script> <script type='text/javascript'> /* <![CDATA[ */ var ja = {"ajax_url":"https:\/\/lln-websites.com\/ja-donations\/wp-admin\/admin-ajax.php","currencies":[{"name":"United States Dollar","code":"USD","price":"1","symbol":"$"},{"name":"Israeli new shekel\/\u05e9\"\u05d7","code":"ILS","price":"3.52","symbol":"\u20aa"},{"name":"Dollar canadien","code":"CAD","price":"1.3","symbol":"$"},{"name":"Australian dollar","code":"AUD","price":"1.28","symbol":"$"},{"name":"Pound sterling","code":"GBP","price":"0.76","symbol":"\u00a3"},{"name":"Euro","code":"EUR","price":"0.86","symbol":"\u20ac"}],"cycle":null}; /* ]]> */ </script> <script type='text/javascript' src='//lln-websites.com/ja-donations/wp-content/themes/humanitas/assets/js/js.js?ver=1.0'></script> <script type='text/javascript' src='//lln-websites.com/ja-donations/wp-content/themes/humanitas/js/skip-link-focus-fix.js?ver=20151215'></script> <script type='text/javascript' src='//lln-websites.com/ja-donations/wp-includes/js/comment-reply.min.js?ver=4.8.25'></script> <script type='text/javascript' src='//lln-websites.com/ja-donations/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js?ver=4.8.25'></script> <script type="text/javascript"> /* <![CDATA[ */ if( typeof woocommerce_price_slider_params !== 'undefined' ) { woocommerce_price_slider_params.currency_format_symbol = wcml_mc_settings.current_currency.symbol; } /* ]]> */ </script> </body> </html>